Understanding learning and development in children

To organize the discussion in this report, the committee elected to use the approach and overarching terms depicted in Figure The committee does not intend to present this as a single best set of terms or a single best categorical organization. Indeed, it is essential to recognize that the domains shown in Figure are not easily separable and that a case can be made for multiple different categorizations.

Understanding learning and development in children

History[ edit ] Learning box for language acquisition Philosophers in ancient societies were interested in how humans acquired the ability to understand and produce language well before empirical methods for testing those theories were developed, but for the most part they seemed to regard language acquisition as a subset of man's ability to acquire knowledge and learn concepts.

Additionally, Sanskrit grammarians debated for over twelve centuries whether humans' ability to recognize the meaning of words was god-given possibly innate or passed down by previous generations and learned from already established conventions: These arguments lean towards the "nurture" side of the argument: Skinner 's Verbal Behaviourhe suggested that the successful use of a sign, such as a word or lexical unitgiven a certain stimulus, reinforces its "momentary" or contextual probability.

Since operant conditioning is contingent on reinforcement by rewards, a child would learn that a specific combination of sounds stands for a specific thing through repeated successful associations made between the two.

A "successful" use of a sign would be one in which the child is understood for example, a child saying "up" when he or she wants to be picked up and rewarded with the desired response from another person, thereby reinforcing the child's understanding of the meaning of that word and making it more likely that he or she will use that word in a similar situation in the future.

Some empiricist theories of language acquisition include the statistical learning theory. Hockett of language acquisition, relational frame theoryfunctionalist linguisticssocial interactionist theoryand usage-based language acquisition.

Skinner's behaviourist idea was strongly attacked by Noam Chomsky in a review article incalling it "largely mythology" and a "serious delusion. Instead, children typically follow a pattern of using an irregular form of a word correctly, making errors later on, and eventually returning to the proper use of the word.

For example, a child may Understanding learning and development in children learn the word "gave" past tense of "give"and later on use the word "gived". Eventually, the child will typically go back to learning the correct word, "gave".

The pattern is difficult to attribute to Skinner's idea of operant conditioning as the primary way that children acquire language. Chomsky argued that if language were solely acquired through behavioral conditioning, children would not likely learn the proper use of a word and suddenly use the word incorrectly.

Chomsky also rejected the term "learning", which Skinner used to claim that children "learn" language through operant conditioning. The language immersion school, operated by the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indiansteaches the same curriculum as other American primary schoolsbut the Cherokee language is the medium of instruction from pre-school on up and students learn it as a first language.

Such schools have proven instrumental in the preservation and perpetuation of the Cherokee language. A major debate in understanding language acquisition is how these capacities are picked up by infants from the linguistic input.

Nativists such as Noam Chomsky have focused on the hugely complex nature of human grammars, the finiteness and ambiguity of the input that children receive, and the relatively limited cognitive abilities of an infant.

From these characteristics, they conclude that the process of language acquisition in infants must be tightly constrained and guided by the biologically given characteristics of the human brain.

Otherwise, they argue, it is extremely difficult to explain how children, within the first five years of life, routinely master the complex, largely tacit grammatical rules of their native language.

In particular, there has been resistance to the possibility that human biology includes any form of specialization for language. This conflict is often referred to as the " nature and nurture " debate. Of course, most scholars acknowledge that certain aspects of language acquisition must result from the specific ways in which the human brain is "wired" a "nature" component, which accounts for the failure of non-human species to acquire human languages and that certain others are shaped by the particular language environment in which a person is raised a "nurture" component, which accounts for the fact that humans raised in different societies acquire different languages.

The as-yet unresolved question is the extent to which the specific cognitive capacities in the "nature" component are also used outside of language. Social interactionist theory Social interactionist theory is an explanation of language development emphasizing the role of social interaction between the developing child and linguistically knowledgeable adults.

It is based largely on the socio-cultural theories of Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotskyand made prominent in the Western world by Jerome Bruner. Specifically, it asserts that much of a child's linguistic growth stems from modeling of and interaction with parents and other adults, who very frequently provide instructive correction.

Understanding learning and development in children

Another key idea within the theory of social interactionism is that of the zone of proximal development. Briefly, this is a theoretical construct denoting the set of tasks a child is capable of performing with guidance, but not alone. Relational frame theory[ edit ] Main article: Based upon the principles of Skinnerian behaviorismRFT posits that children acquire language purely through interacting with the environment.

RFT theorists introduced the concept of functional contextualism in language learning, which emphasizes the importance of predicting and influencing psychological events, such as thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, by focusing on manipulable variables in their context.

RFT distinguishes itself from Skinner's work by identifying and defining a particular type of operant conditioning known as derived relational responding, a learning process that, to date, appears to occur only in humans possessing a capacity for language.

Empirical studies supporting the predictions of RFT suggest that children learn language via a system of inherent reinforcements, challenging the view that language acquisition is based upon innate, language-specific cognitive capacities.

According to these theories, neither nature nor nurture alone is sufficient to trigger language learning; both of these influences must work together in order to allow children to acquire a language.

The proponents of these theories argue that general cognitive processes subserve language acquisition and that the end result of these processes is language-specific phenomena, such as word learning and grammar acquisition.

The findings of many empirical studies support the predictions of these theories, suggesting that language acquisition is a more complex process than many believe.

In the s within the Principles and Parameters framework, this hypothesis was extended into a maturation-based Structure building model of child language regarding the acquisition of functional categories.The early years foundation stage (EYFS) sets standards for the learning, development and care of your child from birth to 5 years old.

All schools and Ofsted-registered early years providers must. Understanding children and identifying needs Print this page St Winefride’s Playgroup, Flintshire, makes detailed observations of the children’s learning in order to identify their needs.

Learning how to cope with adversity is an important part of healthy development. While moderate, short-lived stress responses in the body can promote growth, toxic stress is the strong, unrelieved activation of the body’s stress management system in the absence of protective adult support.

Understanding the stages of child development helps parents know what to expect and how to best support the child as she or he grows and develops. In many settings, early childhood programmes support parents and their children from infancy through age 8, which includes the important transition from home to school.

In each stage of development, it is important for teachers to understand the relationship between neurological development and learning. This understanding is particularly important when there is a mismatch between development and educational expectations.

Understanding How Young Children Learn: Bringing the Science of Child Development to the Classroom tangible ways of enhancing children's learning and intellectual development. Understanding How Young Children Learn will undoubtedly become base reading for educators seeking to delve deeper into understanding cognitive development.".

Unit 1: Understand Child & Young Person Development | Tamari Bennett - initiativeblog.com